Legal Opinion

St. Paul Companies v. Construction Management Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided May 5, 2000No. CV-98-96-BU-PGHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

HATFIELD, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, the St. Paul Companies (formerly United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company (USF & G), referred to coEectively herein as “St. Paul”), instituted the present subrogation action against defendants seeking reimbursement for money paid to its insureds, Bruce and Carolyn Erickson (“Ericksons”), resulting from a fire that destroyed the Ericksons’ home while it was under construction. The named defendants, Construction Management Company, Ltd. (“Construction Management”), Fullerton Management Group, 1 Nick Fullerton, Nick…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Pacific Fire Insurance v. Kenny Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Shannon v. Howard S. Wright Const. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gatzke v. Christian (In Re Gatzke)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007
  2. Mid Continent Cas. Co. v. EngelkeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API