Legal Opinion
Hausknecht v. Ackerman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 22, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs Alan Hausknecht and Solomon Kalish each own one-third of the shares in a corporation, the counterclaim-defendant Charles Emma appeals (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated July 23, 1996, as granted the motion of the defendant Elizabeth Kelly for leave to enter a judgment on her counterclaims against Emma upon his default in replying to the counterclaims, and denied that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss Elizabeth Kelly’s counterclaims or, in the alternative, for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Green v. LeibowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Green Point Savings Bank v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rosato v. RicciardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Marazita v. NelbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pipinias v. J. Sackaris & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Discover Bank v. EschwegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Zareef v. WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Koslowski v. KoslowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pipinias v. J. Sackaris & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014