Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

In this case, we hold that the Arizona Superintendent of Banks has the authority to order a person to repay loan fees earned on transactions which were unauthorized because the person was not a licensed mortgage broker. The case arose as follows.

In 1989, the Superintendent ordered an examination of the affairs of Old Phoenix National Mortgage Company, Inc., to determine whether it was in compliance with the statutes regulating mortgage brokers. The examiners concluded that Morton L. Roberts, who claimed that he was an employee of Old Phoenix, was acting as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Owen v. CreedonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Siler v. Arizona Department of Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Shaffer v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Coplan v. Arizona State Board of AppraisalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API