Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Allen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 6, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*792Liacos, C.J.

We are asked in this case to decide what standard should be applied by a judge when ruling on a motion for a new trial in a civil case where an extraneous “disturbing influence” has been present during jury deliberations. We have recently considered this issue in Markee v. Biasetti, ante 785 (1991).

This medical malpractice case was tried to a jury for about two weeks. There was evidence of the following facts. On May 21, 1982, Debra Fitzpatrick, anticipating the birth of her son, Brian, was admitted to Mount Auburn Hospital for treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Mrs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Ravin v. Gambrell, by and Through EddySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Stagecoach Transportation, Inc. v. Shuttle, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Labate v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. KamaraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Amy Labate & Robert Labate, Individually and On Behalf of Minor Daughter, J.L. v. Rutland Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Rutland Regional Medical Center and Santiago Cancio-Bello, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API