Legal Opinion

Ritchey v. Azar

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 7, 1980No. 65718PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

383 So.2d 360 (1980)

Dan A. RITCHEY, Jr.

v.

Rose Mary AZAR and Paul J. Azar, Sr.

No. 65718.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1980.

Michael P. Pellegrin, Houma, for plaintiff-applicant.

Claude B. Duval, Duval, Funderburk, Sundbery & Lovell, Houma, for defendants-respondents.

DENNIS, Justice.[*],[**]

The question of contractual interpretation presented in this case is whether plaintiff, Dan A. Ritchey, Jr., clearly agreed to compromise his libel action against defendants, Rose Mary Azar and Paul S. Azar, Sr.[1] The trial and appellate courts held that Ritchey was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Cassidy v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Brown v. Drillers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Sassone v. ElderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Ortego v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Migliore v. TrainaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API