Legal Opinion

Parks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 1994No. 93-2031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The adult sanctions imposed upon Derrick Parks, a minor, must be reversed because they were entered without the necessary written reasons and findings. § 39.-059(7)(c), Fla.Stat. (1991); Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993). The requirement of written reasons and findings cannot be met by a transcript. Id. at 532.

Moreover, the sentences imposed, which combine community control and county jail, are departure sentences, State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994), which are invalid *348because the court did not provide written reasons in this case.

There was no indication at sentencing that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Troutman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. Isom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Murray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API