Legal Opinion

Holt v. Roberts

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 12, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, C. J.

These are two petitions under St. 1895, c. 234, to vacate judgments of the Superior Court in replevin for a return and damages, rendered upon nonsuits. The petitions were denied on hearing in the Superior Court, and' the petitioner appealed. Nothing appears on the record beyond these bare facts. The petitions allege, to be sure, that the damages recovered are the value of the chattels ordered to be returned, and that thus she is charged twice for the same things. We are asked to look at a document which purports to be the charge to the jury who assessed the damages, and which, it is said,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobb v. HaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. LeighrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Mergupis v. HackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API