Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1918No. Appeal, No. 322PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal, No. 322, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1912, No. 557, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Benjamin Hoffman v. The .City of Philadelphia. Appeal from award from board of viewers in eminent domain proceedings. Before Carr, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for ,$18,000.00 and judgment' thereon. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was instructions to the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

The proceeding in the court below was an issue for the ascertainment of damages sustained by the plaintiff in the taking of his land by the City of Philadelphia for park purposes. On his appeal from the judgment on the verdict in his favor his sole complaint is that the trial judge erred in instructing the jury as to his right to compensation for delay in paying him his damages. The six assignments of error raise no other question. In his opinion refusing a new trial the learned trial judge comments on certain facts as having been sufficient to warrant a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wayne v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Hoffman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Springer v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. McDermott v. McDermottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Waugh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API