Legal Opinion
Osterweil v. Crean
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1942No. Appeal, 275PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Joseph T. Morris, during a period of forty days, made a number of sales of men’s clothing, in wholesale lots, to Walter Crean. Were these sales made in the ordinary course of trade and in the regular and usual prosecution of Morris’s business, so that there was no necessity on the part of Crean to comply with the provisions of the Bulk Sales Act of May 23, 1919, P. L. 262? That is the question involved in the present controversy.
Plaintiff, Joseph Osterweil, is a jobber of men’s clothing. As the result of sales made by him to Morris between May 7 and July 29,1940, there is due him…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kiley v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hardy v. Sagacious GraceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Gantz v. Kovatch Corp. (In Re Wicaco MacHine Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Miller v. T. I. C. Consumer Discount Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1949
- Wolfe v. Millers Garage, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1954