Legal Opinion

Solomon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 4, 1932No. 254PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

During 1919, the plaintiff was a salesman employed by a corporation called the Hahlo Company under a contract in writing which provided for the payment of $25,000 to him as a salary plus 10 iier cent, of the net profits of the company for that year as additional compensation. After defining the terra “net profits” for tho purposes of the contract, it was further agreed that: “(a) The additional compensation may bo adjusted in accordance with later adjustments of the net income for the year ended December 31, 1919, as finally adjusted by the Treasury Department of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Sugar Land Ry. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. New England Mut. Life Ins. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Republic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Hollie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API