State Ex Rel. Hanna v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Prom the foregoing summary of facts alleged in the petition before us, it is apparent that the relators are asking this court to prohibit the Court of Common Pleas from determining whether part-period directors are parties defendant by reason of the amendment to the fourth amended petition filed in that court.
The writ of prohibition is not an appropriate remedy for the correction of errors and does not lie to prevent an erroneous decision in a case which the court is authorized to adjudicate. The issuance of the writ is not warranted to restrain action by a trial court in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelley v. State ex rel. GellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Allen v. GilkisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Levy v. SavordOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Connor v. McGoughOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Bier v. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- State ex rel. Gelman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1963