Legal Opinion
Thornton v. Parker
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 16, 1952No. 17662PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
Ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial assigns as error a portion of the charge of the court. It is contended that the first sentence of this portion of the charge submitted to the jury as an issue of fact whether or not S. M. Ledford was a notary public for the State of Georgia at large, when the uncontradicted evidence showed that he was not.
The record contains a statement of S. M. Ledford that to the best of his recollection he was never a notary public for the State of Georgia at large, and a certificate of the Secretary of State that S. M. Ledford was a never notary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Durham v. HolemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Haslerig v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Parker v. Waycross & Florida RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Patterson v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burger Barn, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Brookshire v. J. P. Stevens Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Pickler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Moreland v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Sheetz v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.