Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against two defendants for property damage resulting from the collision of their two cars on the highway, followed by the collision of the car of the appellant, Reisler, with that of plaintiff.

The evidence as to the negligence of Reisler was fragmentary and incomplete, but sufficient was shown to make a prima facie case calling for an explanation of the circumstances of the collision on the part of said defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, having made a motion for dismissal which was denied, Reisler then withdrew from the case and the evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyers v. . American Locomotive Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Yager v. YagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Thomas v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Smoake v. MorrowNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ammerman v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Auto Dealers Discount Corp. v. Santoro, New York County Courts1939
  4. Notter v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API