Legal Opinion
People v. Chan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thompson, J.
Defendant’s primary contention on appeal is that he was deprived of a full and fair opportunity to conduct a vigorous and thorough cross-examination of one of the two primary prosecution witnesses. A review of the record leads us to conclude that defendant was not deprived of his right to conduct a vigorous and thorough cross-examination of the witness in issue. Furthermore, in the course of his trial strategy, defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived any possible claim that the cross-examination was curtailed, if such could be deemed to have occurred. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. RensingNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Diocese of Buffalo v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. PossoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992