United States v. Quebe
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY
Sharon L. Ovington, United States Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Believing that Defendants failed to adequately respond to its interrogatories, Plaintiff first moved to compel their responses in June 2016. (Doc. #s 22-23). The parties subsequently agreed to narrow the scope of discovery, and the Court denied Plaintiffs motion without prejudice to renewal. (Doc. # SO). Regrettably, this temporary truce between the parties quickly deteriorated, hope for cooperative discovery dissolved, and Plaintiff renewed its Motion to Compel. (Doc. #42).
In January 2017, the Court partially…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Tung-Hsiung Wu (Sean Tung-Xiung Wu) v. T.W. Wang, Inc. D/B/A World Journal USACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- John Carpenter v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cywes v. CywesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Cywes v. CywesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Steven E. Greer v. Susan Harreld, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026