Stokley v. Dorville
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
*87OPINION OF THE COUE.T
Phoebe K. Greenbaum, J.
In this paternity and support proceeding under article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner Tracey Stokley and the respondent Arnold Dorville have filed separate objections to the written findings of fact and final order of support entered by Hearing Examiner Five on November 15, 1997.
This case raises the question of the whether the Hearing Examiner has the authority under section 440 (1) (a) of the Family Court Act to order that payment of retroactive support be held in abeyance when the enforcement and collection services of the Support…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richardson v. Scott M. C.New York City Family Court · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franklin County Department of Social Services ex rel. Lavair v. MandigoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Cordero v. Commissioner of Social Services, Support Collection UnitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016