Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Pitts

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1929No. 27931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-oweN, J.

Appellee, Pitts, sued appellant, Lancaster, for damages based on malicious prosecution in causing appellee to be criminally prosecuted for trespass in cutting- trees belonging to appellant and on his land.

Upon an issue made up by the pleadings, the cause was submitted to a jury, which returned a substantial verdict in favor of appellee; judgment wa.s accordingly entered, and from that judgment appellant prosecutes an appeal here.

Appellant was refused a. peremptory instruction by the court below, and this refusal is assigned here as error. There are other assignments of error, but we shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Threefoot v. NuckolsMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Berry v. PriddyMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. TreweilderMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  4. McNulty v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Vicksburg S. & P. R. R. v. PorterfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royal Oil Co., Inc. v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API