Fitzpatrick v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion
Staton, P.J.
— Fitzpatrick contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his plea. The affidavit charging Fitzpatrick with carrying a pistol without a license was read to him at his arraignment. Furthermore, the trial court questioned him as to whether he did in fact commit the offense. I concur in result because I believe, under the facts of this case, that the trial court’s ascertainment of the factual basis for - the plea was sufficient, and Fitzpatrick has shown no prejudice because of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Charles Mack McGrady v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- People v. NeuhalfenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975