Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fitzpatrick v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1975No. 3-475A59Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion

Staton, P.J.

— Fitzpatrick contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his plea. The affidavit charging Fitzpatrick with carrying a pistol without a license was read to him at his arraignment. Furthermore, the trial court questioned him as to whether he did in fact commit the offense. I concur in result because I believe, under the facts of this case, that the trial court’s ascertainment of the factual basis for - the plea was sufficient, and Fitzpatrick has shown no prejudice because of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Charles Mack McGrady v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  3. People v. NeuhalfenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API