Anderson & Shackleford v. Birmingham Mineral Railroad
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bibb. Tried before the Hon. John Moore.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Appellants sued in caseto recover damages for the killing of two oxen. After the evidence had closed, the court instructed the jury that, if they believed the evidence, their verdict should be the de7 fendant. The giving of this charge is assigned as error. The rule is that when there is a conflict in the evidence on material facts, or when the facts are if such a character, if believed, as to admit of different conclusions, the affirmative charge should not be given. On the other hand, if the evidence is such that, if believed by the jury, only one inference is left open, it is not error for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. McAlpine & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crandall-Pettee Co. v. Jebeles & Colias Conf. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mobile Light & Railroad v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Northern Ala. Ry. Co. v. WhiteAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. BristerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v. HodgesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.