Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1963No. 40274Published

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. Special ground 1 complains of the trial judge’s omission of the phrase, “the nature of the facts to which they testified,” from his unrequested charge in the substantial language of Code § 38-107, i.e., as to the factors the jury may consider in determining where the preponderance of evidence lies.

“While both the Supreme Court and this court have held that the better practice in charging on this Code section is to instruct the jury with respect to all of the elements set forth in the Code section, nevertheless, it is not the intention of this rule as announced by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Robison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. ShamosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. George v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API