Legal Opinion

Kerr v. . Purdy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was an action for specific performance. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged in substance that George W. Purdy leased to George A. Kerr certain premises for a term of five years, the lease containing a clause giving the lessee the privilege of purchasing at any time within the first three years by paying all arrears of rent and $10,000; that Purdy died intestate, leaving a widow and five children, his heirs-at-law; that plaintiff as Kerr’s assignor purchased the share of two…

Read the full summary

This was an action for specific performance. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged in substance that George W. Purdy leased to George A. Kerr certain premises for a term of five years, the lease containing a clause giving the lessee the privilege of purchasing at any time within the first three years by paying all arrears of rent and $10,000; that Purdy died intestate, leaving a widow and five children, his heirs-at-law; that plaintiff as Kerr’s assignor purchased the share of two of the heirs, and before the expiration of the three years tendered to the other heirs, the defendants, their shares of…

1Opinion of the Court

Lott, Ch. C.,

reads for reversal.

All concur.

Order of General Term reversed and judgment upon the report of the referee affirmed.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ray v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Doepfner v. BowersNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Steele v. BondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Friederang v. Ruth Aldo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Brinley v. NevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API