Legal Opinion

Kisloff v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1998No. Claim No. 92299Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In a claim to recover damages for negligence, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), entered March 4, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The submissions made by the defendant State of New York established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the claim (see, e.g., Winegrad v New York *681Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851; Zuckerman v New York City, 49 NY2d 557; Helmbrecht v Krauthamer, 239 AD2d 316). In support of its motion for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Roth v. SpletzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Helmbrecht v. KrauthamerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API