Commonwealth v. Ruiz
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
After their convictions by a Superior Court jury on various weapons and assault charges relating to an attempted home invasion in Lowell, the defendants appeal, claiming that their motions to suppress should have been allowed. The defendant Mosquea raises an additional issue, alleging the improper admission of prior bad act evidence. We affirm the convictions.
1. The motions to suppress. The relevant facts as found by the motion judge, who was not the trial judge, and supplemented by uncontroverted testimony at the suppression hearing, see Commonwealth v. Rivera, 33 Mass. App. Ct. 311, 312…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. StouteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. StoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MartinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EmuakporMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. McCoyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. McKoyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018