Woodward Iron Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
“A paradox, a paradox,
A most ingenious paradox!” 1
The taxpayer, through 1953 consistent in its ratable deductions of state ad valorem taxes, reads a 1954 statute as automatically transmuting it into taking lump sum deductions while urging that the congressional intent of the statute was to accommodate change from lump sum to ratable methods.
The taxpayer owns property in Alabama, in which state ad valorem taxes are assessed and collected on the basis of a fiscal year beginning October 1 and ending September 30. During the years in question the taxpayer used the calendar…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Magruder v. SuppleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Herbert S. Witte v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Douthit v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Evans v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.