Legal Opinion

Cassady v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1886No. 11,001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The only error assigned by appellants, the plaintiffs below, is the sustaining of appellees’ demurrer, for the alleged want of sufficient facts, to their complaint.

The appellants, Melissa and Burton Cassady, alleged in their complaint, that on the 26th day of April, 1877, Emma Martin, since deceased, recovered in the Vigo Circuit Court a judgment against Sydney B. Davis, administrator of the estate of Adaline-Cassady, for the sum of $181.80, and costs of suit, a copy of which judgment was filed with the complaint as a part thereof; that from an inspection of such judgment it would be seen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Exchange Bank v. AultIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Anderson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Dowell v. LahrIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Runner v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Davis v. ClementsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API