Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Nuno-Huizar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1988No. 88-5192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Juan Nuno-Huizar appeals his sentence of 2 years imprisonment and two years of supervised release. He argues that the prison term should not have exceeded 7 months, the maximum period of imprisonment recommended by the probation officer as computed by application of the Sentencing Guidelines of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. He also argues that the entire sentence is defective because the trial court relied on the supervised release provision of the Sentencing Reform Act which we have since held to be unconstitutional.

Nuno, one of 13 defendants, was named in all six counts of an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Willie Ray JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Ryan, JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Justina Martinez-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Marco L.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API