In re Tia

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 Case No.: 2-25-cv-01659-RFB-NJK 8 IN RE TIA ORDER DENYING FRIVOLOUS 9 MOTIONS 10 11 Before the Court are Plaintiff Peter Tia’s Motion to Investigate (ECF No. 18) and Motion for 12 Hearing (ECF No. 22). Because these motions are frivolous, the Court denies them pursuant to its 13 inherent authority to manage its own docket. 14 District courts “possess[ ] inherent powers that are ‘governed not by rule or statue but by the 15 control necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and 16…