Craig's Ex'or v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Cash 71 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL EROM LINCOLN CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The improvements, as they now stand, represent W. H. Anderson’s money which he should have used to pay appellant’s debts, and which he had no right, being insolvent, to use to enhance the value of his-wife’s land. (5 Ky. Law Rep., 690; 9 Ky. Law Rep., 1013; 10 Ky.
Read the full summary
Cash 71 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL EROM LINCOLN CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The improvements, as they now stand, represent W. H. Anderson’s money which he should have used to pay appellant’s debts, and which he had no right, being insolvent, to use to enhance the value of his-wife’s land. (5 Ky. Law Rep., 690; 9 Ky. Law Rep., 1013; 10 Ky. Law Rep., 55; Heck v. Eisher, 78 Ky., 643.) 2. The departure of appellees, Anderson and wife, from this State obstructed the prosecution of this action, which suspended the running of the statute of limitation applicable thereto. The fact that appellant might have…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE GUEEY
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action was brought in the Lincoln Circuit Court June 23, 1893, by H. Helm, executor of R. Gr. Craig, against Wm. H. Anderson and Julia L. Anderson, his wife, and others, seeking to obtain judgment on a note executed to said Craig by Wm. H. Anderson and others, for one thousand five hundred and ninety-seven dollars and fifty cents, dated September 10th, 1879, due in twelve months; also seeking to subject the interest of Wm. H. Anderson in a lot of land conveyed to his wife by-Little, on the ground that the husband had erected and placed on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Selden v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brittain v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901