Legal Opinion

Hinish v. Oliver

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1903No. 12,944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Marion district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

This was an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate. The contract rested in letters exchanged between the parties, the essential parts of which are as follows :

“Eureka, Kan., Jan’y 1, 1901.
“ G. F. Oliver, New Philadelphia, Ohio:
“Dear Sir — My partner, John C. Hinish, I think, will give $3200, for the farm with the improvements, $700 cash, and $2500 on 7 years’ time at 6 per cent, interest annually. Very truly,

Frank Dibert.”

Mr. Oliver replied as follows :

“New Philadelphia, Ohio, Jan’y 15,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenawalt v. EsteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Knox v. McMurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. HardestySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Orr v. RiegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Wallace v. BogigianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API