Legal Opinion
Hinish v. Oliver
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 7, 1903No. 12,944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from Marion district court; O. L. Moore, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J. :
This was an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate. The contract rested in letters exchanged between the parties, the essential parts of which are as follows :
“Eureka, Kan., Jan’y 1, 1901.
“ G. F. Oliver, New Philadelphia, Ohio:
“Dear Sir — My partner, John C. Hinish, I think, will give $3200, for the farm with the improvements, $700 cash, and $2500 on 7 years’ time at 6 per cent, interest annually. Very truly,
Frank Dibert.”
Mr. Oliver replied as follows :
“New Philadelphia, Ohio, Jan’y 15,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greenawalt v. EsteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Knox v. McMurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. HardestySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Orr v. RiegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Wallace v. BogigianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921