Legal Opinion
Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Carlsen
California Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 8044PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
An opinion in this proceeding was rendered by the district court of appeal, second district, second division. Thereafter we granted a motion for a hearing thereof in this court. The following portion of said opinion rendered by the district court of appeal we hereby adopt as the opinion of this court:
“This action is one in interpleader. The appeal is from an order granting a motion for nonsuit made by the defendants and respondents F. C. Carlsen and Petroleum Midway Company, also from an order denying the prayer of the plaintiff.
“The circumstances out of which this litigation arose are that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGinn v. Interstate National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Walker v. BambergerUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Davisson v. Citizens' National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- Carlsen v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hart v. BarronMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- First Security Bank of Idaho, Nat. Ass'n v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Pacific Loan Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Westamerica Bank v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.