Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Gormley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ITNK.HAM, C.
The defendant in error, C. F. Gormley, instituted bis action as plaintiff in tbe district court of Creek county against tbe Smith Oil Corporation, Pure Oil Corporation, Quaker oil & Gas Company, S. L. Johnson, 1). W. Falconer, ffm. Heard, and tbe Osage Oil & Refining Company, to recover tbe sum of $3,238, with interest, and the sum of $1,000 attorneys’ fees, and for tbe foreclosure of a lien for tbe construction of an oil field derrick upon a certain described uíl and gas mining lease, and all equipment and material thereon.
Thereafter the defendant in error J. W.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Williams v. MagouirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Cleveland v. HightowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Duty v. Texas-Cushing Oil & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Hays Drilling Co. v. SartainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Continental Supply Co. v. Geo. H. Greenan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Pierce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938