Legal Opinion

Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Gormley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1926No. 16749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ITNK.HAM, C.

The defendant in error, C. F. Gormley, instituted bis action as plaintiff in tbe district court of Creek county against tbe Smith Oil Corporation, Pure Oil Corporation, Quaker oil & Gas Company, S. L. Johnson, 1). W. Falconer, ffm. Heard, and tbe Osage Oil & Refining Company, to recover tbe sum of $3,238, with interest, and the sum of $1,000 attorneys’ fees, and for tbe foreclosure of a lien for tbe construction of an oil field derrick upon a certain described uíl and gas mining lease, and all equipment and material thereon.

Thereafter the defendant in error J. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Williams v. MagouirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Cleveland v. HightowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Duty v. Texas-Cushing Oil & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Hays Drilling Co. v. SartainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Geo. H. Greenan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Pierce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API