Legal Opinion

Howard v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1922No. 12621Published

Action for damages; from McDuffie superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. June 8, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

When this case was here before, the verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff was set aside because, under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Jarrell, 145 Ga. 688 (89 S. E. 118), the evidence was not deemed sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the engine of the defendant caused the fire by the emission of sparks. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Howard, 25 Ga. App. 83 (102 S. E. 456). On the second trial (in which a verdict for the defendant was directed by the court) there was additional testimony submitted by the plaintiff on this point *376and also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Culpeper National Bank, Inc. v. Tidewater Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  2. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. JarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MaynardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Central of Georgia Railway v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API