Legal Opinion

Royal Oak Wholesale Co. v. Ford

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1965No. Docket 220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

By various agreements, plaintiff had the use of a spur railroad track for its business from June 1, 1923, until tbe fall of 1960. Part of tbe spur traversed lot 1, Assessor’s Plat No. 27, Royal Oak. June 1, 1955, defendant granted her nephew, Fred A. Erb, a 15-year option to purchase part of lot T; tbis was recorded in Oakland county register of deeds’ office on April 2, 1956. July 13, 1956, defendant conveyed part of lot 1 to plaintiff; on tbis part stood some of plaintiff’s buildings and a portion of tbe spur. On tbe same day and as part of tbe same transaction, defendant leased tbe spur…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Choals v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Grinnell Bros. v. AsiuliewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Minnis v. Newbro-Gallogly Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources v. Board of Trustees of Westminster ChurchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Slatterly v. MadiolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. United Coin Meter Co v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API