In re Estate of Raichley
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUCK, PJ.
In applying the equitable principle that attorneys may be compensated by a court, of equity out of a fund Which has been *300acquired or protected by those attorneys some states have gone so far as to permit such charges against an estate where counsel have failed to sustain a will. In Ohio, however, the Supreme Court long ago took the view that when a will is adjudged invalid the expenses incurred in the unsuccessful effort to sustain it can not be charged against the estate. Andrews’ Executors v His Administrators, 7 Oh St 143. At the same time, however, the court indicated, perhaps…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate of DickeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hymel v. Bing, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940