Legal Opinion

Saull v. Seplowe

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

Motion by defendants to dismiss the first and third canses of action under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for insufficiency; and the fourth cause of action under subdivision 5 of rule 107 as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff sues individually and as a stockholder of the corporate defendant. The complaint contains four causes of action, the first cause of action, against all the defendants, alleges a conspiracy between the individual defendants to oust plaintiff as a director and officer of the corporation, that plaintiff was ousted and was damaged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Walrath v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Wood v. . AmoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Cohn v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Friedman v. NaginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campione v. CampioneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Woodriff v. AshcraftOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API