Saull v. Seplowe
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.
Motion by defendants to dismiss the first and third canses of action under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for insufficiency; and the fourth cause of action under subdivision 5 of rule 107 as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff sues individually and as a stockholder of the corporate defendant. The complaint contains four causes of action, the first cause of action, against all the defendants, alleges a conspiracy between the individual defendants to oust plaintiff as a director and officer of the corporation, that plaintiff was ousted and was damaged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Walrath v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Wood v. . AmoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cohn v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Friedman v. NaginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Campione v. CampioneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Woodriff v. AshcraftOregon Supreme Court · 1972