Legal Opinion

Riley v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2002No. 00-2488PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Riley appeals the grant of summary judgment to Hewlett-Packard (HP) in this contract dispute. The district court granted HP summary judgment on the basis that the accounts receivable at the center of the dispute were assigned in violation of an anti-assignment clause in a subcontracting agreement between Clover Technologies, Inc. (Clover) and HP. The anti-assignment clause is clear and valid. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

In 1996, HP executed a master subcontractor agreement with Clover. The agreement required Clover to provide labor, materials, and technical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Napier v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Fox-Greenwald Sheet Metal Co., Inc. v. Markowitz Bros., Inc., Continental Casualty Co., Blake Construction Co., Inc., United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Gerdes Ex Rel. Griffin Chiropractic ClinicCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Wonsey v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  5. Brookridge Funding Corp. v. Northwestern Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Tenet Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Ohio Environmental Development Ltd. Partnership v. Envirotest Systems Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  3. Harding v. Viking Internatl. Resources Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API