Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Estes v. Lonbaken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2011No. 25768Published

1ConcurrenceKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 12.] If we are going to overrule our precedent, we ought to say so explicitly. In a case plaintiff relies on, Kreager v. Blomstrom Oil Co., this Court held that “the determination of a venue motion must be made from the allegations of plaintiffs *612complaint; no other pleading is relevant to the issue.” 298 N.W.2d 519, 520 (S.D.1980) (citation omitted). Today, to thwart artfully drafted complaints, the Court rules: “we now hold that courts making proper venue determinations are not limited to only examining the complaint.” I agree.

[¶ 13.] This common sense holding comports with rulings in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mosby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Kreager v. Blomstrom Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kolb v. MonroeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API