Legal Opinion
Hinners v. Pekin Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-1294PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
Stephen Hinners was struck and severely injured in South Carolina by an uninsured vehicle. His wife, Lori Stark Hinners, was living with her parents in Iowa at the time of the accident. Her father, Cletus Stark, had a policy of insurance with the defendant Pekin Insurance Company which provided uninsured motorist protection for “a person related [to the named insured] by blood ... who is a resident of [the named insured’s] household.”
Lori Hinners claimed a loss of her husband’s consortium as a result of the South Carolina accident and sought payment under the Pekin policy.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Casteel v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Davenport v. Aid Ins. Co.(Mutual)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Daley v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Daley v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wetherbee v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Allstate Insurance v. FackettNevada Supreme Court · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.