Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1966No. [App. No. 62, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, C. J.

In his application for leave to appeal, petitioner states four grounds for relief: (1) that his constitutional rights were violated; (2) that he did not have counsel at his preliminary hearing (at which time he entered, or had entered on his behalf, a plea of not guilty); (3) that he was illegally arrested; and, (4) that conflicting statements were made by the State’s witnesses.

The court below (Judge Cardin) denied relief on the first ground raised by petitioner, because it was a mere bald allegation of a denial of constitutional rights. Matthews v. Warden, 223 Md. 649.

On the second point,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arrington v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Duff v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Matthews v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salisbury v. GrimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Fraley v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API