Legal Opinion
Smith v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1950No. 882PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
This case is here in the form of an appeal we granted on application, 1 to review defendant’s conviction on a charge of operating an automobile without indentification tags. 2 From an amended statement of proceedings and evidence approved by the trial judge, and from other sources in the record, we gather that the facts of the case were substantially as follows:
About 2:00 a. m. on the date of the offense charged, a police officer named Krog-man saw two men (defendant admittedly being one of them) pushing by hand an automobile on which there were no license plates along…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- People v. Domagala, New York County Courts1924
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- United States v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
- Dewhirst v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Robles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Edmonston v. StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Young v. TuneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961