Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCrone v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1938No. 8836Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

(dissenting),

I dissent.

jn tbe jnstant case, the majority opinion bojds tbat tbe appead should be dismissed because appellant did not comply with 28 u.S.C.A. § 230, which provides that no »appeal intended to bring any judgment or decree before a circuit court of appeals for rev¡ew shall be allowed unless application therefor be duly made within three months after the entry of such judgment or decree”. That statute is treated as being in existence and as the controlling rule,

prior t0 our hearing of the cause, there became effective the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provide in rule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tighe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API