Legal Opinion
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 25, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8203PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Presiding Judge.
This appeal involves the construction of A.R.S. § 15-458, which authorizes the subdivision of an existing school district into two separate districts. It also concerns the impact of such a subdivision on the tenure and probationary status of teachers from the old district who contract to teach for the new subdivided district.
Shirley Britt (Britt) was a “continuing teacher,” with tenure, in the Chinle Unified School District No. 24 (Chinle District). Paul Parido (Parido) was a “probationary teacher,” without tenure, in the Chinle District. See A.R.S. § 15-501(A).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Board of Regents of the Universities & State College v. City of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990