Montgomery v. Burch
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
We have concluded that we were in error in holding, as we held in our original opinion, that appellee was not entitled to enforce an implied contract' for compensation as managing partner of the oil station at Tulia. Appellant and appellee were partners in an oil filling station in the town of Tulia. This partnership existed for three years under the supervision and management of hired help with the occasional supervision of each of the partners.
About the end of the three years, Burch, the appellee, tools charge of the business, and with the occasional advice and financial assistance of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hooker v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Rains v. WeilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Marsh's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conrad v. JudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Stanley v. Reef Securities, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Lewis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Davis v. SpenglerSupreme Court of Florida · 1957