Cremeens v. Kree Institute of Electrolysis, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.
Respondent, Charlene Cremeens, and her husband, David Cremeens, instituted a civil action for money damages alleging that Mrs. Cremeens sustained facial injuries as a result of an electrolysis treatment that she had received on December 27, 1980, at a Famous-Barr beauty salon. Respondent alleged that Glemby International Missouri, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Glem-by”) operated the beauty salon and that appellant, Kree Institute of Electrolysis (hereinafter referred to as “Kree”), manufactured the electrolysis machine in question and trained and employed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Shafer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Warner v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Epps v. RagsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Glossip v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert L. Fox v. Todd Allen DannenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Weaks v. RuppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Donald Laubach v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Calvin v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Graham v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.