Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Pacific Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1934No. 125PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Respondent brought this action, in the district court for northern California, to recover $143,122.23 it had paid as income tax for 1923. The complaint alleges facts upon which respondent claims to have been overassessed in that sum as a result of failure to take into account deductible losses. One loss ($479,625) resulted from the liquidation in 1923 of A. F. Thane & Company, a wholly owned subsidiary. The other ($953,134.49) was the indebtedness of that company to respondent, ascertained to be worthless and charged off by the latter in that year. Petitioner’s answer put in issue some, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Handy & Harman v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Bush Terminal Bldgs. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Builders & Mfrs. Mut. Casualty Co. v. Preferred Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Pierce Oil Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  5. Marwais Steel Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API