Legal Opinion
Calise v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1958No. Civ. 22934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
The petitioners are two labor unions and through their officers are seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from hearing an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue enjoining petitioners from causing or inducing the cannery-worker employees of the real party in interest to refuse to unload and process certain deliveries of fish, from boycotting or picketing the plant and business of the real party in interest, and from doing various other acts as detailed in said order to show cause. The petition likewise seeks to restrain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Retail Clerks' Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Heavy, Highway Building & Construction Teamsters Committee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Retail Clerks' Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959