Legal Opinion

Miller v. . Pitts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from J. S. Adams, J., at January Term, 1910, of McDowell. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought by tbe plaintiff, as a surety on tbe distiller’s bond of tbe defendant Abel Pitts, to recover. the amount which be was compelled to pay under a judgment recovered in tbe United States District Court for tbe Western District of North Carolina, against Pitts as principal and himself as surety, for $500, tbe amount or penalty of said bond. Tbe parties waived a trial by jury and agreed that tbe judge might find tbe facts, and it appears from bis findings that tbe bond was executed by Abel Pitts' as principal and tbe defendants Lee Miller and Thomas Epley as sureties. It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Preslar v. StallworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. State Ex Rel. Brown v. PikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Chairman of Washington County Court Ex Rel. Armistead v. HarramondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1826

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. BalsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Robert G. Lassiter & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Jones v. . BalsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API