Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 6, 1959No. 37609PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
In support of their motion to dismiss the writ of error, the defendants in error contend that the bill of exceptions does not name or specify a defendant in error. Code § 6-1202, as amended (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 227), states in pertinent portion: “Essential parties. Who are interested parties. — When the record shows clearly who were parties to the litigation in the court below, the writ of error shall not be dismissed because the bill of exceptions fails to specify or designate the parties plaintiff in error or defendant in error . . .” While it is true that the bill of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Georgia Marine Salvage Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Rourke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cline v. Lever Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- COTTON STATES INSURANCE COMPANY v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Griggs v. All-Steel Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.