Locke v. State

I agree with the conclusion reached in the unpublished memorandum in this case finding that Edward Locke was not entitled to relief based on the five claims presented in his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. However, I can concur only in the result as to two of the issues.

Locke appeals the. circuit court’s summary dismissal of his second Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. . The petition challenged his 1985 conviction for capital murder and his sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. This Court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. Locke v. State, 527 So.2d 1343…