Legal Opinion

Janice J. v. Superior Court of Solano Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1997No. A077604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This petition seeks writ review under California Rules of Court, rule 39.1B (rule 39.IB). We summarily deny the petition because of a procedural defect fatal to appellate review.

Petitioner failed to attend the 18-month review hearing. The record shows her whereabouts were unknown. The notice of intent is signed by her attorney. The petition is signed by her attorney. There is no indication whatsoever that petitioner has personally authorized the petition.

A rule 39.IB petition may be summarily dismissed in the absence of a showing that the parent consented to, or authorized…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SUZANNE J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Contra Costa County Social Services Department v. Darlene G.California Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API